Persecutions of Heathens

 

Click below for more information

Home Page - Index
 
Authorities Assessed
Old Testament
New Testament
Apostolic Traditions
Church Fathers
Emperors
General Church Councils
Popes
Conclusions
 
Early Christian History
What Jesus Believed
Who Founded Christianity?
Creation of Doctrine
Origin of Ideas & Practices
The Concept of Orthodoxy
Origin of the Priesthood
 
Maintaining Deceptions
Suppress Facts
Selecting Sources
Fabricating Records
Retrospective Prophesy
Ambiguous Authorities
Ignore Injunctions
Invent, Amend and Discard
Manipulate Language
 
Case Studies
Re-branding a Sky-God
Making One God out of Many
How Mary keeps her Virginity
Fabricating the Nativity Story
Managing Inconvenient Texts
 
Christianity & Science
Traditional Battlegrounds
Modern Battlegrounds
 
Rational Explanations
Religion in General
Christianity in Particular
Divine Human Beings
Ease of Creating Religions
 
Arguments for and Against
Popular Arguments
Philosophical Arguments
Moral Arguments
Miracles, Revelation & Faith
Practical Arguments
 
Record of Christianity
Social Issues
Persecution
Church & State
Abuse of Power
Human Rights
Attitudes to Sex
Science & Medicine
Violence & Warfare
Cultural Vandalism
Possible Explanations
Summing up
 
Continuing Damage
Religious Discrimination
Christian Discrimination
Moral Dangers
Abuse of Power
 
A Final Summing Up
 
 
 
Bibliography
 
 
Search site
 
;
 
 
Heathen: A benighted creature who has the folly to worship something he can see and feel.
Ambrose Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary

 

Up until the time of Constantine, Christianity was a small and inconsequential sect. During his reign Christians won positions of prominence and power. Those who opposed Christianity, "enemies of true religion", were stripped of their honours, and those who had supported the previous, pagan, emperor were executed*. Eusebius, a bishop, gloated over the fate of people who had elected to worship other gods. They were accused of fraud, subjected to "elaborate tortures" to confirm the charges, then handed over to the executioner*. By the end of Constantine's reign all pagan cults were being discouraged, and temples were being destroyed. Toleration was under threat. As Gibbon noted:

The edict of Milan, the great charter of toleration, had confirmed to each individual of the Roman world the privilege of choosing and professing his own religion. But this inestimable privilege was soon violated; with the knowledge of truth the emperor imbibed the maxims of persecution; and the sects which dissented from the Catholic Church were afflicted and oppressed by the triumph of Christianity*.

The Edict of Milan had been issued by the emperors Constantine and Licinius in 313, and gave official support to the toleration of Christianity. As soon as Christians became influential, the issue of toleration was no longer so important to them. By 330 Constantine was prohibiting pagan rites in Constantinople, his new capital. By around 350 the performance of a pagan sacrifice had become a capital offence*. A few years later, in 391, under Theodosius I, Christianity became the only recognised religion of the Empire. In time the Church, supported by pliant Christian emperors, would eliminate its many rivals, although it would take centuries to achieve a total monopoly. Already, by the middle of the fourth century the Christians were being accused of cruelty exceeding that of wild animals*. All religions except Christianity were suppressed, sacred property was confiscated, holy treasures were seized, temples and shrines were destroyed or taken over as new churches. The ancient rights of sanctuary that had been enjoyed by followers of all religions at their burial grounds were abrogated.

Anyone who failed to display the required enthusiasm for the Christian god was dealt with severely. Charges were laid by informants. Perjured evidence was presented to, and accepted by, partisan tribunals. Confessions were extracted with the help of torture. Young and old alike were induced to implicate their friends and families. Many were executed. The lucky ones were merely imprisoned or exiled. In some provinces prisoners, exiles and fugitives from Christian intolerance were said to account for more than half of the population. Property was confiscated, and the Church grew rich.

According to St Augustine and others, Jesus had clearly authorised forcible conversions: "Go out into the highways and hedges, and compel them to come in, that my house may be filled" (Luke 14:23). Whole countries were won over in this way. The Saxons were forcibly converted at sword point. Charlemagne offered them the choice of adopting Christianity or instant death. In a single day, according to Christian Chronicles, 4,500 Saxons chose to die rather than forsake their own religion.

The pattern was similar in Franconia after the death of Clovis in 511. First, Christians were favoured at court. Then non-Christian public worship was prohibited. Soon, even private worship was made illegal, and forcible conversions were enforced from 625 under Dagobert I.

The pattern was similar in England. Pope Gregory the Great initially authorised the destruction of pagan temples, but later reconsidered the benefits of a more practical approach. On reflection he decided that the temples should be siezed and converted into churches. Now only the pagan icons were to be destroyed and replaced by Christian relics. To assure continuity he also authorised the sacrifice of oxen even after the temples had been converted into churches with Christian alters*. Christian chroniclers did not always make records of the pagans they executed for refusing to convert, but archaeologists can sometimes reconstruct events. The Execution Cemetry at Sutton Hoo contains the bones of hundreds of Saxons, which is difficult to explain except as one of an unknown number of mass executions of Saxons who refused to convert. There was more chance of a written record when rival Christians were executed. Catholic missionaries like King Ethelfrid killed not only pagans but defenceless Christian monks who belonged to the original Christian Church of the British Isles and so were regarded as rivals. Bede records that some 1,200 unarmed Celtic monks were killed by Ethelfrid's Catholic forces at the Battle of Chester in 616*.

Late in the tenth century Russia was converted when Prince Vladimir adopted Christianity. His subjects were given the choice of Christian baptism in the river Dneiper or drowning in it. Vladimir is now a saint. Soon afterwards Norway was converted under King Olav, again largely at the point of the sword. He too is now a saint. Other Scandinavians, Slavs, and many other peoples were converted in the same way. The Christianisation of Iceland was much less bloody than usual, although it shows the technique. A Saxon missionary, Friedrich arrived in the tenth century but was forced to leave when his assistant Thorvaldur killed too many locals. In AD 1000 King Olav of Norway (Ólafur Tryggvason) was possessed by one of his periodic bouts of Christian zeal. As an Icelandic historian, Jón Hjálmarsson, relates:

King Ólafur's first missionary to Iceland was Stefnir Thorgilsson, a native of Iceland, who started by attacking and breaking down heathen temples, and was promptly exiled. Next, the King sent a Flemish priest named Thangbrandur, who had reached Norway via England. He managed to baptise several of the noble Icelandic chieftains, but as he could not tolerate any opposition and killed several men who spoke against him, he too had to leave the country*.

Further Christian missionaries so destabilised the country that Thorgeir, the lawspeaker, was asked to decide what should be done. A liberal and tolerant pagan himself, he decided that the best way to keep the peace was that Christianity should be adopted as the national religion, but that the people should be allowed to keep many of their traditional practices, including the right to worship in private whatever gods they chose. It seemed to be more than fair. Hjálmarsson says of the conversion:

The introduction of Christianity in Iceland was a peaceful and almost unique historical event. It was quite different from the prolonged conflicts, warfare and bloodshed which customarily accompanied Christianization in most other countries. This peaceful settlement arose probably more for political than religious reasons.

Within 16 years the exemptions for traditional practices, including the liberty to worship other gods, was abrogated. Christians now denied the liberty of worship that they had previously advocated for themselves. Within a century compulsory tithes were introduced. Soon the Benedictines and Augustinians would introduce the abuses and corruption common in mainland Europe.

Outside Europe non-Christian Peoples were persecuted and exterminated for centuries. The options were conversion to Christianity or either death or slavery.

Over many centuries Christians killed thousands, perhaps millions, for the crime of not being Christian or sometimes for the crime of not being sufficiently Christian. Some were killed by the sword, some burned alive, some drowned, some buried alive, some forced to face wild animals. Traditional Christian history books rarely find room for this side of the story.

 

 

Delicious
 

 

Notes

§. Eusebius, The History of the Church, 9:11.

§. Eusebius, The History of the Church, 9:11 , referring to Theotecnus and his partners.

§. Gibbon, The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire , Penguin, p 385.

§. Pollock and Maitland, The History of English Law, p 3.

§. Gibbon, The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, Penguin p ???. {Ch. xxi, note 161, citing Ammianus [Check this] 4SOGR p 178}.

§. Letter from Pope Gregory to Milletus AD 601 cited by the Venerable Bede in his Ecclesiastical History of the English Nation ch XXX. “ .... the temples of the idols in that nation ought not to be destroyed; but let the idols that are in them be destroyed; let holy water be made and sprinkled in the said temples, let altars be erected, and relics placed. For if those temples are well built, it is requisite that they be converted from the worship of devils to the service of the true God; .... celebrate the solemnity with religious feasting, and no more offer beasts to the Devil, but kill cattle to the praise of God in their eating.” For the full text see http://www.sacred-texts.com/chr/bede/hist032.htm English translation by A.M. Sellar, ed, 1907.

§. Bede's Ecclesiastical History of England, ed. by A.M. Sellar, [1907], Chapter II at http://www.sacred-texts.com/chr/bede/hist038.htm. The massacre of Christian monks was justified by the fact that they were praying for the wrong Christian faction: ""If then they cry to their God against us, in truth, though they do not bear arms, yet they fight against us, because they assail us with their curses." He, therefore, commanded them to be attacked first, and then destroyed the rest of the impious army, not without great loss of his own forces. About twelve hundred of those that came to pray are said to have been killed, and only fifty to have escaped by flight."

§. Jón Hjálmarsson, History of Iceland, (Iceland Review, 1993), pp 29, 32, 33, 44 and 71.

 

 
 
   •   © TFF 2010   •   Further Resources    •   Link to Us    •   Contact    •