Treatment of the Insane

 

Click below for more information

Home Page - Index
 
Authorities Assessed
Old Testament
New Testament
Apostolic Traditions
Church Fathers
Emperors
General Church Councils
Popes
Conclusions
 
Early Christian History
What Jesus Believed
Who Founded Christianity?
Creation of Doctrine
Origin of Ideas & Practices
The Concept of Orthodoxy
Origin of the Priesthood
 
Maintaining Deceptions
Suppress Facts
Selecting Sources
Fabricating Records
Retrospective Prophesy
Ambiguous Authorities
Ignore Injunctions
Invent, Amend and Discard
Manipulate Language
 
Case Studies
Re-branding a Sky-God
Making One God out of Many
How Mary keeps her Virginity
Fabricating the Nativity Story
Managing Inconvenient Texts
 
Christianity & Science
Traditional Battlegrounds
Modern Battlegrounds
 
Rational Explanations
Religion in General
Christianity in Particular
Divine Human Beings
Ease of Creating Religions
 
Arguments for and Against
Popular Arguments
Philosophical Arguments
Moral Arguments
Miracles, Revelation & Faith
Practical Arguments
 
Record of Christianity
Social Issues
Persecution
Church & State
Abuse of Power
Human Rights
Attitudes to Sex
Science & Medicine
Violence & Warfare
Cultural Vandalism
Possible Explanations
Summing up
 
Continuing Damage
Religious Discrimination
Christian Discrimination
Moral Dangers
Abuse of Power
 
A Final Summing Up
 
 
 
Bibliography
 
 
Search site
 
;
 
…a rod is for the back of him that is void of understanding.
Proverbs 10:13

According to Christians, lunatics were possessed by unclean spirits. To effect a cure it was therefore necessary to dislodge the offending spirit. This idea derived from gospel stories of exorcisms.

And there was in their synagogue a man with an unclean spirit; and he cried out , Saying, Let us alone; what have we to do with thee, thou Jesus of Nazareth? art thou come to destroy us? I know thee who thou art, The Holy One of God. And Jesus rebuked him, saying, Hold thy peace, and come out of him.
Mark 1:23-25

Such beliefs had at least two unfortunate consequences. The first was that for many centuries no advance was made in understanding the nature of mental illness — although it is clear that Christians did understand the there was such a thing as insanity*. The second was that many thousands of men, women and children, already burdened with madness, were confined in chains and subjected to routine torture. The idea was that by making the environment sufficiently uncomfortable, the torturers might induce the possessing spirit to leave its human host. In some monasteries, the monks whipped their insane charges regularly every day. Although the method was spectacularly unsuccessful, no one seems to have realised the fact for many centuries. Sometimes the insane were beaten out of the parish with quarterstaffs. Sometimes they were loaded onto ships and sent off to die or become a problem for someone else. This is the origin of the various popular tales about a "ship of fools".

For as long as the Church controlled the insane, they endured dreadful torments. They were imprisoned, chained to a wall (or if they were lucky to a bed), flogged, starved, insulted, tortured, immersed in iced water and otherwise brutalised. It also seems safe to assume that sexual abuse would have been commonplace in view of twentieth century disclosures about monasteries, seminaries, church schools, orphanages and state mental asylums. Throughout Christendom the insane were kept in insanitary conditions in mad-houses and exposed to public ridicule. The most famous place in England for such people was the hospital of St Mary of Bethlehem ("Bedlam"), where visitors were charged a fee to see the inmates, and were allowed to provoke them and laugh at them. A few inmates came to their senses, some died of old age, some died of neglect, starvation, exposure or torture, and many died of "putrid fever" or other infectious diseases that flourished in such conditions.

The Christian Church fiercely opposed the idea that insanity might have a physical cause, since it knew for a fact that it was attributable to evil spirits, and the Bible confirmed that beating was the correct treatment:

A whip for the horse, a bridle for the ass, and a rod for the fool's back.
Proverbs 26:3

In practice, Christian mental asylums were often used as prisons. Anyone that the Church did not like, or did not approve of, could be imprisoned without trial in an asylum, and then tortured and abused at will. Victims ranged from critics of Church excesses (including political radicals and atheists) to unmarried mothers, as well as the genuinely insane.

The insane were not only a source of public entertainment, they were also an object lesson as to where immorality could lead. In France the devout Parisian bourgeoisie enjoyed Sunday excursions to Bicêtre to watch the insane perform tricks. By flicking a whip an attendant would make them dance and perform acrobatics like monkeys at a circus. For churchmen the main problem was not to reform such institutions, but to ensure that they were used to deliver the correct moral message to the spectators. Here is the Abbé Desmonceaux writing on National Benevolence in 1789 describing his idea of an asylum that could be used to illustrate the effects of immorality:

The sight of these shadowy places and the guilty creatures they contain is well calculated to preserve from the same acts of just reprobation the deviations of a too licentious youth; it is thus prudent of mothers and fathers to familiarize their children at an early age with these horrible and detestable places, where shame and turpitude fetter crime, where man corrupted in his essence, often loses forever the rights he had acquired in society*.

The Church lost its power in France soon afer this, during the French Revolution, and mad-houses soon became a thing of the past. A wide range of abuses ended as a direct result of the Declaration of the Rights of Man: "No man may be arrested or detained except in the cases determined by law and according to the forms therein prescribed…The law must permit only the penalties strictly and evidently necessary.... ". By a decree of 1790 the insane who had been confined in religious houses, houses of correction and elsewhere were to be examined by a magistrate to establish whether they really were mad. Those who were not mad were to be released and those who were mad were to be transferred to hospital*. Humane treatment of the insane was pioneered in France, by Philippe Pinel, appointed to the asylum at Bicêtre in 1793 under the new secular government. One of his first acts was to remove the chains from the inmates

In Britain the idea of a proper hospital or asylum, as opposed to the traditional mad-house, was introduced by William Tuke, a Quaker, who founded a retreat near York in 1794. The institution was more like a farm with a great walled garden than a prison. There were no grilles or bars on the windows, and like Pinel, Tuke removed the chains from his patients. By the early nineteenth century Parliament was investigating the Bethlehem Hospital and its traditional practices. In 1815, for one penny it was still possible each Sunday to watch the insane perform their tricks to the insults and mocking laughter of the devout*.

Secular ideas triumphed in the nineteenth century. Abuses were suppressed as the Churches lost their influence, and soon people were asking in wonder how it could be that previously "No one blushed to put the insane in prison"*.

 

More social issues:

 

Delicious
 

 

Notes

§. Inquisitors would occasionally discharge accused people as insane. One rare example was Guillaume Postel born in 1510 a scholar of Arabic who was found to be heretical but harmlessly insane for his eccentric religious beliefs.

§. Cited by Foucault, Madness and Civilization, p 207.

§. Foucault, Madness and Civilization, pp 236-7.

§. Foucault, Madness and Civilization, pp 68-9.

§. Foucault, Madness and Civilization, p 221.

 

 
 
   •   © TFF 2010   •   Further Resources    •   Link to Us    •   Contact    •